Monday, January 24, 2011

Project Name

With overwhelming response from the telecom fraternity across the globe we are eager to finalise and  finish specs and work on core areas.
Whilst working on the same we now earnestly request you people to suggest rather christen a name for our “open source 16 e1/t1 telecom card

11 comments:

  1. Please please please add H.100 daisy-chaining + TDM switch between the card.
    All "crappy cheap" cards on the market don't do it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a good suggestion we can add one zarlink switch , for H.100 we will check what to add . Thanks for suggesting us the change

    ReplyDelete
  3. @alito please see the new arch diagrams we have covered TSI and h100/110 interface will as well be added

    ReplyDelete
  4. How about we name it "Tarantula OSTC" ?
    OSTC for "Open Source Telephony Card".

    ReplyDelete
  5. To Author,

    We don't know the way to contact you.

    If you are interested we can post your articles in http://www.learntelecom.com/ under your name
    Are even you can create your profile & post article on Learn Telecom. Already few professional started sharing there knowledge on Learn Telecom.

    Please reply us, if you are interested on support[at]learntelecom.com

    Regards,
    LT Team

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Kiran Kumar - Tarantula is a big spider. Big, fearsome, powerful, smart, awesome.
    Here's the wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarantula

    ReplyDelete
  7. By the way I do not like spiders but the name sounds awesome... Tarantula OSTC. I can see the little spider logo printed on the cards already :D

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks DJ ...................lets wait for few more names and we will close it

    ReplyDelete
  9. How about KeyRun ? just a thought...

    And, We need to complete this with a date so that, we can reach market requirement on time. I saw another site (some Chinese/Korean) who already started similar project.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello Kiran,

    Any update on this? Your ideas look amazing but could you implement any of this so far?

    Regards

    ReplyDelete